RE: [sv-ac] Proposal uploaded for Mantis 2654 (Ballot Comment #93)

Hi Tom,

 

The problem I have with this solution is that it makes other diagrams look
off too.  For example - Figure 16.13 and 16.14. I thought someone (Ed??) was
going to look at clarifying that the signals shown in the diagram are
actually depicting the sampled values of signals, in which case the change
would be to say:

 

"Because the sampled value of signal burst_mode is high at clock tick 1 and
low at clock tick 2, $fell(burst_mode) is true at

clock tick 2."

 

Lisa

 

Ps Figure 16.14 is misplaced too in my copy

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of Thomas Thatcher
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 12:59 PM
To: sv-ac@server.eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] Proposal uploaded for Mantis 2654 (Ballot Comment #93)

 

Hello Everyone,

 

I have uploaded a proposal for Mantis 2654 (ballot comment #93).  The 

solution for this comment was simply to edit Figure 16-12, and move the 

signal transitions forward to the middle of the cycle, before the clock 

edge.  I re-created part of the figure to illustrate the change.  Let me 

know if I need to do something more to help the editor with this change.

 

Thanks,

 

Tom

 

-- 

This message has been scanned for viruses and

dangerous content by MailScanner, and is

believed to be clean.

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.