[sv-ac] FW: [P1800] March 2009 P1800 Ballot Comments

Hi all,

I am resending Shalom's comments to be addressed at today's meeting.

Dmitry

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 8:09 AM
To: SV-AC eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] RE: [P1800] March 2009 P1800 Ballot Comments

Hi,

On comment #83: regarding the statement on p. 310:

"However, in order to verify proper behavior of the system and conform as closely as possible to truly cycle-based semantics, the signals in a clock expression must be glitch-free and should only transition once at any simulation time."

the word "must" should be changed. We are to avoid "must" as much as possible.


On comment #86, which requests an example of cyclic dependencies, the comment is not clear to me as the bottom on page 319 has an example. Maybe a request for clarification should be sent to the commenter.


On comment #87, I think the reference is to "= sequence_actual_arg" in sequence_port_item in Syntax 16-5 on page 317 (351) and not as stated in the xls.


On comment #89: this has since been filed as Mantis 2612.

Thanks,
Shalom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.