Hi, On comment #83: regarding the statement on p. 310: "However, in order to verify proper behavior of the system and conform as closely as possible to truly cycle-based semantics, the signals in a clock expression must be glitch-free and should only transition once at any simulation time." the word "must" should be changed. We are to avoid "must" as much as possible. On comment #86, which requests an example of cyclic dependencies, the comment is not clear to me as the bottom on page 319 has an example. Maybe a request for clarification should be sent to the commenter. On comment #87, I think the reference is to "= sequence_actual_arg" in sequence_port_item in Syntax 16-5 on page 317 (351) and not as stated in the xls. On comment #89: this has since been filed as Mantis 2612. Thanks, Shalom --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sat Apr 4 22:10:43 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Apr 04 2009 - 22:11:48 PDT