RE: [sv-ac] Draft 8 review

Dmitry,
 
Thanks!  These changes will go into the final draft 8 (the ballot draft),
which will be delivered tomorrow.
 
Stu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stuart Sutherland
stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
+1-503-692-0898
www.sutherland-hdl.com


 
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Korchemny, Dmitry
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 12:04 PM
To: stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
Cc: sv-ac@server.eda.org; Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM
Subject: [sv-ac] Draft 8 review
 
Hi Stu,
 
Here is a feedback I collected from SV-AC about the changes done in Draft 8.
 
Substitutions of "ensure" and "guarantee":
 
.         Beginning of 16.2 Overview, it is written:
 
In addition, assertions can be used to provide functional coverage and to
ensure verify that input stimulus that is used for validation conforms to
assumed requirements.
 
Our recommendation:
 
In addition, assertions can be used to provide functional coverage and to
ensure flag when input stimulus that is used for validation does not conform
conforms  to assumed requirements.
 
.         16.5 Concurrent assertions overview, it is written:
 
It is important to ensure that the The defined clock behavior is glitch
free. 
 
Our recommendation:
 
It is important to ensure that the defined clock behavior is be glitch free.
 
 
The following changes requested as a result of Draft 7a review haven't been
implemented in Draft 8 (I am adjusting the numeration whenever appropriate):
 
.         Annex F.3.4.3.5, change "Let specify(b) is" to "Let specify(b)
be".  Rationale:  Grammar.
.         Annex F.5.6.1.  The second definition of "w,L_0 |= accept_on (b)
P"  needs to be deleted.
 
Thanks
Dmitry
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by  <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.