[sv-ac] Comments on reviewing Draft8

Hi all,

Here is the draft of the letter I am going to send to Stu tomorrow. If you have any comments, please, send them to me ASAP!

Thanks,
Dmitry


Hi Stu,

Here is a feedback I collected from SV-AC about the changes done in Draft 8.

Substitutions of "ensure" and "guarantee":


*         Beginning of 16.2 Overview, it is written:


In addition, assertions can be used to provide functional coverage and to ensure verify that input stimulus that is used for validation conforms to assumed requirements.

Our recommendation:

In addition, assertions can be used to provide functional coverage and to ensure flag when input stimulus that is used for validation does not conform conforms  to assumed requirements.


*         16.5 Concurrent assertions overview, it is written:

It is important to ensure that the The defined clock behavior is glitch free.

Our recommendation:

It is important to ensure that the defined clock behavior is be glitch free.


The following changes requested as a result of Draft 7a review haven't been implemented in Draft 8 (I am adjusting the numeration whenever appropriate):


*         Annex F.3.4.3.5, change "Let specify(b) is" to "Let specify(b) be".  Rationale:  Grammar.

*         Annex F.5.6.1.  The second definition of "w,L_0 |= accept_on (b) P"  needs to be deleted.

Thanks
Dmitry
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.