[sv-ac] Re: Mantis 2478 Clock flow subclause is not consistent with multiclocked property definition

From: Neil Korpusik <Neil.Korpusik_at_.....>
Date: Mon Oct 27 2008 - 10:25:11 PDT
Hi Dmitry,

The proposal for Mantis item 2478 was discussed in the Working Group
meeting last Thursday.

I described the situation in the meeting and then made a motion to approve
the proposal. No one was willing to second the motion. As a result, this
proposal will not be part of the ballot draft (which will be draft 8).

There is a reluctance to allow any more changes to the LRM at this point in
time. Only purely Editorial changes are being allowed by the Working Group.


Neil



On 10/27/08 02:09, Korchemny, Dmitry wrote:
> Hi Neil,
> 
>  
> 
> What should be the next steps with 2478? This item was resolved by 
> SV-AC, but since it has not been discussed by the WG, it hasn’t been 
> implemented in Draft7a. I think this issue is a SS for the LRM release.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dmitry
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Oct 27 10:30:30 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 27 2008 - 10:31:51 PDT