RE: [sv-ac] Formal part of 1932

I agree with Stu.

 

Dmitry

 

From: Stuart Sutherland [mailto:stuart@sutherland-hdl.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 5:17 PM
To: Bustan, Doron; Korchemny, Dmitry; sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] Formal part of 1932

 

In my opinion, these are all editorial changes.

 

Stu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stuart Sutherland
stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
+1-503-692-0898

www.sutherland-hdl.com



 

From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Bustan, Doron
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 1:15 AM
To: Korchemny, Dmitry; sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] Formal part of 1932

 

Hi Dmitry,

 

I reviewed the implementation of 1932 at Annex F of D7a.

The only issues I have found are those pointed by the editor.

 

I created a bug note to fix them (attached).

 

I am not sure that all the fixes can be considered editorial. Please
take a look.

 

Thanks

 

Doron

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.