RE: [sv-ac] Draft7 cross-review

Stu - 37.53 should be deleted (let diagrams coming from older proposals
other than 2414) can you let us know if already done/planned or you need
a mantis item ?

 

Thx.

-Bassam.

From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Bassam Tabbara
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2008 10:55 AM
To: sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] Draft7 cross-review

 

Hi Dmitry,

 

>>> BT: Clauses 37, 39, Annex O - done.

 

I found 1 issue - Stu I believe is already aware of this so likely
already in the works, adding Stu on cc, I am not sure if/where to add a
note / file a new mantis.

 

- 37.53  should be deleted.

- BTW Stu the answer to "Should "restrict" also be added 37.44?" is NO
since no runtime data at the note says.

 

Thx.

-Bassam.

 

------------

From:    owner-sv-ac@eda.org on behalf of Korchemny, Dmitry
[dmitry.korchemny@intel.com]

Sent:     Tuesday, September 23, 2008 5:03 AM

To:          sv-ac@eda.org

Subject:               [sv-ac] Draft7 cross-review

 

Hi all,

 

 

Please, find below assignments for Draft7 cross-review. It is important
both to verify the changes and to make sure that the existing stuff
remains relevant taking into account latest changes introduced by SV-AC
and by SV-SC, There is no need to proofread the new stuff added by
SV-SC.

 

In case you find problems, please, add a note to a corresponding Mantis
item. If the problem is not editorial, open a new Mantis item and send
an email.

 

When your review is completed, please, send a separate notification even
if no problems are found. Send also a notification in case you are
unable to make the cross-review.

 

 

Assignments:

 

 

*             YF: 14, 16.5, 16.5

*             EC: 16 (beginning) - 16.4

*             ES: 16.8-16.10

*             JH: 16.11-16.14

*             LP: 16.15

*             DK: 16.16 - 16 (end)

*             MK: 16.6, Clause 20, Annex Q

*             BT: Clauses 37, 39, Annex O

*             TT: Annex A

*             DB: 16.7, Annex F

 

Thanks,

Dmitry


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.