All, The second paragraph of F.2 is marked as a 1938 addition. It is not 1938. I need to know which mantis item is it so I can review it. Could you look at the text below, and if it something you wrote it, send me the mantis number? Thanks Doron The semantics in this annex describe each evaluation of a concurrent assertion, but there may be many evaluations for each assertion implied within SystemVerilog code. This annex does not define the semantics of queueing an instance of a concurrent assertion in procedural code (16.15.6). Once a pending procedural assertion instance has matured, the semantics of the resulting property evaluation is defined by this annex. If multiple evaluation attempts of a particular procedural concurrent assertion all mature, each of those matured attempts is described separately by the equations in this annex. For a concurrent assertion statement outside procedural code, which is continuously monitored, an instance of the equations in this annex exists for each starting clock event of the assertion. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Sep 23 21:51:38 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 23 2008 - 21:52:30 PDT