Re: [sv-ac] Mantis 2478

From: Neil Korpusik <Neil.Korpusik_at_.....>
Date: Mon Sep 22 2008 - 18:36:29 PDT
Hi Dmitry,

It appears that the change specified in 2478 doesn't have anything to do with
the proposal in 1683. It sounds like you just happened to notice this
unrelated issue during your review of 1683.

Do you know which mantis item has made this text inconsistent?
Since the only changes in the proposal for 2478 is to delete some text, there
must be a mantis item that had a proposal which made this text inconsistent.

This doesn't appear to be strictly editorial, but the more information that
you can provide to let us understand how this inconsistency was created, the
easier it might be to get it approved by the Working Group. I am currently
thinking that there was an incomplete change specified in some mantis item
that you just now noticed.

At this point in time the committees should only be addressing editorial
issues. This issue seems to be borderline editorial, at best.

Neil


On 09/22/08 01:50, Korchemny, Dmitry wrote:
> Hi Neil,
> 
>  
> 
> While checking Mantis 1683 I found that the subclause 16.14.3 is not 
> consistent anymore with the rest of the text. I opened a new Mantis 2478 
> to address this issue, though I am not sure that we are allowed to 
> address it. IMO this issue is a SS. We will vote on this Mantis today 
> conditionally on your approval.
> 
>  
> 
> What is the right way to deal with this issue?
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dmitry
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Sep 22 18:37:04 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 22 2008 - 18:38:02 PDT