[sv-ac] review of Mantis 1901

From: Eduard Cerny <Eduard.Cerny_at_.....>
Date: Thu Jun 26 2008 - 14:00:25 PDT
Hi,

 

1901 is correct.

 

Best regards,

ed

 

 

PS: Other: in D6, pp 309, it says:

 

consecutive_repetition ::=

[* const_or_range_expression ]

| ##[*]

| ##[+]

 

I think that it should be

 

consecutive_repetition ::=

[* const_or_range_expression ]

| [*]

| [+]


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Jun 26 14:01:49 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 26 2008 - 14:02:00 PDT