[sv-ac] Mantis 1682 (Draft6)

From: Korchemny, Dmitry <dmitry.korchemny_at_.....>
Date: Mon Jun 23 2008 - 08:14:36 PDT
Hi all,

 

I reviewed the implementation of Mantis 1682 in Draft6 and found the
following issues:

 

*	Page 327. Swap subclauses 16.9.3 and 16.9.4.
*	Page 328, Editor note: The symbol \equiv should be defined
before use.
*	Page 328, LSB should be replaced with "least significant bit".
*	Page 328. The editor deleted the word "Example" and showed it in
red. Deleting "Example" is indeed correct, but then it should not appear
in the draft at all (even in red).
*	Page 329. Answer to the editor's question: yes, the references
are correct.
*	Page 329, bottom. "In the" and "we see" is in red - probably
shows the editor's changes relative to the Mantis proposal. Such changes
should be commented in the margins, while the main text should reflect
only changes relative to the Draft5.
*	Page 330. Same with "we wait".
*	Page 330. Answer to the editor's question: yes, the references
are correct.
*	Page 1006, 38.4, the second line above Figure 38-1. cb_time
should be in italic.
*	Changes in Annex F haven't been implemented yet.

 

Dmitry

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Jun 23 08:16:44 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 23 2008 - 08:17:27 PDT