> This [let] construct needs to be generalized for use in > expressions other than just assertions. In a previous discussion of "let" I asked that people take a look at the macro mechanism in the 'e' language, which (as far as I can tell) is well-defined and more than meets the requirements for 'let'. Unfortunately there did not appear to be any further consideration of this. Now that 'e' is a published IEEE standard (1647) it seems foolish not to look at an effective and applicable piece of prior art. -- Jonathan Bromley, Consultant DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services Doulos Ltd. Church Hatch, 22 Market Place, Ringwood, Hampshire, BH24 1AW, UK Tel: +44 (0)1425 471223 Email: jonathan.bromley@doulos.com Fax: +44 (0)1425 471573 Web: http://www.doulos.com The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Apr 7 12:28:07 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 07 2008 - 12:29:13 PDT