Hi again, Yes, indeed, it was not a good choice. E.g., Mantis requires all child issues to be resolved before this one is. I will revert the relationships, and will add a note what the real dependencies are. Thanks, Dmitry -----Original Message----- From: Korchemny, Dmitry Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 1:09 PM To: Bresticker, Shalom Cc: 'Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM' Subject: RE: [SystemVerilog P1800 0001900]: Add new 'checker' construct to SVA Hi Shalom, I can replace it when new categories are added, but I don't see any other alternative now. I assume that "child" means that the current proposal depends on the other one, and should the other proposal be rejected, the current proposal would have to be modified. "Parent" is symmetrical. Thanks, Dmitry -----Original Message----- From: Bresticker, Shalom Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 12:37 PM To: Korchemny, Dmitry Cc: Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM Subject: RE: [SystemVerilog P1800 0001900]: Add new 'checker' construct to SVA Hi, Dmitry. I don't think it is correct to categorize 1900 as a 'child' of issues like 1648. I think 'child' indicates either a sub-issue or a continuation or extension. None of these are the case here. Having 1900 assuming that 1648 is approved is not enough to make 1900 a child of 1648. It would be nice if Mantis could indicate other types of dependency relationships. Maybe Dave Rich can do it. Shalom > Relationships ID Summary > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > parent of 0002089 Allow checker construct (<a href="view.... > parent of 0002088 Allow Checker construct (<a href="view.... > parent of 0002093 Checker construct (<a href="view.php?id... > parent of 0002111 Allow parameters in checkers > parent of 0002110 Allow checkers in procedural for loops > parent of 0002182 Elaborate VPI diagrams for checkers > parent of 0002206 Random simulation of non-deterministic ... > parent of 0002290 add signal valued system function model... > related to 0001846 D3 21.13: add 1800-2008 to `begin_keywords > child of 0001648 Default reset for assertions > child of 0001682 Future value functions > child of 0001683 Relax rules for building multiclocked p... > child of 0001728 Introduce "let"statement > child of 0001549 add missing formal argument types > child of 0001681 Introduce global clocking --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Mar 26 04:20:23 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 26 2008 - 04:21:26 PDT