RE: [sv-ac] notes from SV-AC meeting 2008-03-18

Hi John,

This is a pure typo that needs to be fixed: the text in black is not the
exact text from Draft 4. The omitted part of it should be in red.

Dmitry

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of John Havlicek
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 2:18 PM
To: Korchemny, Dmitry
Cc: Bresticker, Shalom; sv-ac@server.eda.org; Neil.Korpusik@sun.com
Subject: Re: [sv-ac] notes from SV-AC meeting 2008-03-18

Hi Dmitry:

I have not yet seen a representation of the rationale for the change.
I might have missed it, in which case I will appreciate a reminder.

J.H.

> X-eda.org-MailScanner-Watermark:
1206518838.78842@P6FYAmNNvJKMl/um+cZymw
> X-Authentication-Warning: server.eda.org: majordom set sender to
owner-sv-ac@eda.org using -f
> X-eda.org-MailScanner-Watermark:
1206518788.49621@suyqwh2Bt7MKm5mEfzoj1Q
> X-ExtLoop1: 1
> X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,523,1199692800"; 
>    d="scan'208,217";a="357047839"
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:01:08 +0200
> X-MS-Has-Attach: 
> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
> Thread-Topic: [sv-ac] notes from SV-AC meeting 2008-03-18
> Thread-Index: AciJQL9HSPlxyXQ5ScyfnXMchgOR6gAMHnEAAAlS6IA=
> From: "Korchemny, Dmitry" <dmitry.korchemny@intel.com>
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Mar 2008 08:01:44.0417 (UTC)
FILETIME=[790F4510:01C88997]
> X-eda.org-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
> X-Spam-Status: No, No
> Sender: owner-sv-ac@eda.org
> X-eda.org-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
information
> X-MailScanner-ID: m2J87GOE029994
> X-eda.org-MailScanner-From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org
> 
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> 
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C88997.628C5C15
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> Hi Shalom, Neil,
> 
> =20
> 
> Yes, you are right, I looked at 19.9 there only. This 1641 has already
> been approved. Should we reopen it to make the change and then revert
> its status back to "approved"?
> 
> =20
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dmitry
> 
> =20
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Bresticker, Shalom=20
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 5:30 AM
> To: Korchemny, Dmitry; sv-ac@server.eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ac] notes from SV-AC meeting 2008-03-18
> 
> =20
> 
> Hi,
> 
> =20
> 
> =46rom the minutes:
> 
> =20
> 
> - SB: 1641: explicitly delete the phrase ", which can be suppressed in
a
> tool-specific manner" in 16.3.
> 
> . Already done in 1641.
> 
> =20
> 
> This is not true. The description of $warning in 16.3, which is where
> this phrase appears in Draft 4, is treated as text not to be changed.
> There is no instruction to the editor to delete this phrase.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Shalom
> 
> =09=20
> 
> =09

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.