RE: [sv-ac] Mantis 1641

Hi Shalom,

 

I'll check this and get back to you tomorrow.

 

Thanks.

Manisha

 

From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 7:22 PM
To: sv-ac@server.eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] Mantis 1641

 

Hi, 

Mantis 1641 contains the following text for 16.3: 

The information about assertion failure can be printed using one of the
following severity system tasks in the action block.

- $fatal is a run-time fatal. 
- $error is a run-time error. 
- $warning is a run-time warning. 
- $info indicates that the assertion failure carries no specific
severity. 

The problem is that the current LRM has for $warning: 
- $warning is a run-time warning, which can be suppressed in a
tool-specific manner. 

In the proposal, the second half of the sentence disappeared, without
being explicitly deleted. The proposal does explicitly delete the
parallel text in 19.9.

The proposal also replaces the following text in 16.3: 
If an assertion fails and no else clause is specified, the tool shall,
by default, call $error, unless a toolspecific option, such as a
command-line option, is enabled to suppress the failure.

with this: 
If an assertion fails and no else clause is specified, the tool shall,
by default, call $error, unless $assertfailoff is used to suppress the
failure. 

I think the proposal should explicitly delete the phrase ", which can be
suppressed in a tool-specific manner" in 16.3. 

Thanks, 
Shalom 

Shalom Bresticker 
Intel Jerusalem LAD DA 
+972 2 589-6582 
+972 54 721-1033 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.