RE: [sv-ac] more on 1900

From: Korchemny, Dmitry <dmitry.korchemny_at_.....>
Date: Wed Feb 27 2008 - 15:55:22 PST
Hi Shalom,

 

I uploaded a new version addressing your comment. It automatically
addresses the other comment you sent later.

 

Thanks,

Dmitry

 

________________________________

From: Bresticker, Shalom 
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 12:11 PM
To: Korchemny, Dmitry
Cc: 'sv-ac@server.eda.org'
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] more on 1900

 

Thanks, but I did not see an answer to the following:

 

"But if initial_check and always_check appear in
checker_or_generate_item, they may not be needed in initial_keyword and
always_keyword."

 

Did I miss something simple?

 

Thanks,

Shalom

	 

	
________________________________


	From: Korchemny, Dmitry 
	Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 7:31 AM
	To: Bresticker, Shalom; 'Lisa Piper'
	Cc: 'sv-ac@server.eda.org'
	Subject: RE: [sv-ac] more on 1900

	Fixed.

	 

	Dmitry

	 

	
________________________________


	From: Bresticker, Shalom 
	Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 9:48 PM
	To: Lisa Piper; Korchemny, Dmitry
	Cc: sv-ac@server.eda.org
	Subject: RE: [sv-ac] more on 1900

	 

	The footnotes on initial_keyword and always_keyword are placed
differently in A.6.2 from in 9.2 and in 16.18.2. 

	 

	But if initial_check and always_check appear in
checker_or_generate_item, they may not be needed in initial_keyword and
always_keyword.

	 

	Shalom

		 

		2)      page 36 and page 40 - module common item: A.6.2
page 43 now includes always_check  in always_construct and initial_check
in initial_construct, though these are not allowed in a module.  I think
you need to list them separately now.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Feb 27 15:55:55 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 27 2008 - 15:56:04 PST