Hi Shalom, I uploaded a new version addressing your comment. It automatically addresses the other comment you sent later. Thanks, Dmitry ________________________________ From: Bresticker, Shalom Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 12:11 PM To: Korchemny, Dmitry Cc: 'sv-ac@server.eda.org' Subject: RE: [sv-ac] more on 1900 Thanks, but I did not see an answer to the following: "But if initial_check and always_check appear in checker_or_generate_item, they may not be needed in initial_keyword and always_keyword." Did I miss something simple? Thanks, Shalom ________________________________ From: Korchemny, Dmitry Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 7:31 AM To: Bresticker, Shalom; 'Lisa Piper' Cc: 'sv-ac@server.eda.org' Subject: RE: [sv-ac] more on 1900 Fixed. Dmitry ________________________________ From: Bresticker, Shalom Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 9:48 PM To: Lisa Piper; Korchemny, Dmitry Cc: sv-ac@server.eda.org Subject: RE: [sv-ac] more on 1900 The footnotes on initial_keyword and always_keyword are placed differently in A.6.2 from in 9.2 and in 16.18.2. But if initial_check and always_check appear in checker_or_generate_item, they may not be needed in initial_keyword and always_keyword. Shalom 2) page 36 and page 40 - module common item: A.6.2 page 43 now includes always_check in always_construct and initial_check in initial_construct, though these are not allowed in a module. I think you need to list them separately now. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Feb 27 15:55:55 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 27 2008 - 15:56:04 PST