John, Did you not see that both Lisa and I sent comments on the 23rd? Thanks, Shalom > 1900 passed with exactly 50% of eligible votes. There was a > friendly amendment. See below. > Friendly Amendments: > > [TT] > > In the section which talks about where a checker may be > instantiated, There should be a sentence that says that the > same placement restrictions for concurrent assertions also > apply to checkers. And put a reference to 16.4. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Feb 25 06:59:00 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 25 2008 - 07:55:17 PST