Re: [sv-ac] RE: call to vote on 1769

Hi Manisha,
I did not out it in the existing section because the new use is at elaboration and not simulation. In the same section it could be confusing to the reader.

Regards,

Ed

Sent from BlackBerry.


----- Original Message -----
From: Kulshrestha, Manisha <Manisha_Kulshrestha@mentor.com>
To: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker@intel.com>; john.havlicek@freescale.com <john.havlicek@freescale.com>; sv-ac@eda.org <sv-ac@eda.org>
Cc: Bustan, Doron <doron.bustan@intel.com>; eduard.cerny@synopsys.COM <eduard.cerny@synopsys.COM>; yaniv.fais@freescale.com <yaniv.fais@freescale.com>; Korchemny, Dmitry <dmitry.korchemny@intel.com>; johan.martensson@jasper-da.com <johan.martensson@jasper-da.com>; piper@cadence.com <piper@cadence.com>; Seligman, Erik <erik.seligman@intel.com>; bassam.tabbara@synopsys.COM <bassam.tabbara@synopsys.COM>; thomas.thatcher@sun.com <thomas.thatcher@sun.com>
Sent: Sun Feb 24 23:37:34 2008
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] RE: call to vote on 1769

Hi,

As per 1641:

These tasks already appear as 'severity system tasks' in 19.1. In the
description of these tasks, we show two possibilities of their usage: 1.
In assertions and 2. In regular code.

Now this proposal is introducing same tasks as elaboration time tasks.
Since these tasks are already there in the LRM, I think this proposal
should not create a new category of tasks. The new category was fine
when the names were different. 

Just like 1641, this proposal should show another usage of these tasks
in 19.9 and also enhance the syntax for elab time usage.

Thanks.
Manisha

-----Original Message-----
From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] 
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 12:36 AM
To: Kulshrestha, Manisha; john.havlicek@freescale.com;
sv-ac@server.eda.org
Cc: Bustan, Doron; eduard.cerny@synopsys.com; yaniv.fais@freescale.com;
Korchemny, Dmitry; johan.martensson@jasper-da.com; piper@cadence.com;
Seligman, Erik; bassam.tabbara@synopsys.com; thomas.thatcher@sun.com
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] RE: call to vote on 1769

Could you be more specific?

Thanks,
Shalom 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Kulshrestha, Manisha
> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 12:42 PM
> To: john.havlicek@freescale.com; sv-ac@server.eda.org
> Cc: Bustan, Doron; eduard.cerny@synopsys.com; 
> yaniv.fais@freescale.com; Korchemny, Dmitry; 
> johan.martensson@jasper-da.com; piper@cadence.com; Seligman, 
> Erik; bassam.tabbara@synopsys.com; thomas.thatcher@sun.com
> Subject: [sv-ac] RE: call to vote on 1769
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I vote 'no' as this proposal needs to align with 1641 (which 
> has already made these system tasks usable in regular code). 
> Now that 1769 uses the same names for the tasks, it needs to 
> change accordingly.
> 
> Thanks.
> Manisha
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Havlicek [mailto:john.havlicek@freescale.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 10:49 PM
> To: sv-ac@eda.org
> Cc: doron.bustan@intel.com; eduard.cerny@synopsys.com; 
> yaniv.fais@freescale.com; john.havlicek@freescale.com; 
> dmitry.korchemny@intel.com; Kulshrestha, Manisha; 
> johan.martensson@jasper-da.com; piper@cadence.com; 
> erik.seligman@intel.com; bassam.tabbara@synopsys.com; 
> thomas.thatcher@sun.com
> Subject: call to vote on 1769
> 
> Hi Folks:
> 
> This is the call to vote on the revised proposal for 1769.
> The document on Mantis is
> 
>    1769_ElaborationTimeUserAssert.080221.pdf
> 
> See details below.
> 
> J.H.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> ----------
> Ballot on Mantis 1769
> 
> - Called on 2008-02-21, final ballots due by 2008-02-24 T 23:59-08:00.
> - Please ensure that John Havlicek receives your ballot.
> 
>  v[x-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xx] 
> Doron Bustan
> (Intel)
>  v[xxxxxxxxxx--xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-x] 
> Eduard Cerny
> (Synopsys)     
>  n[---------------------------x-xxx---------x-x-xxx-x---x] 
> Surrendra Dudani (Synopsys)  
> v[xxx-xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx-xx-xxxxx-xxx-xxx-------] Yaniv Fais
> (Freescale)
>  t[xxxxxxxxx--xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> John Havlicek (Freescale - Chair)  
> v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxrxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxx] 
> Dmitry Korchemny (Intel - Co-Chair)  
> v[-xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx-xxx-x--xx--xxxxx----------xx-xxxx] 
> Manisha Kulshrestha (Mentor Graphics)  
> n[--x-x-------------------------------------------------] Ah-Lam Lee
> (Qualcomm)
>  n[-----------------------------------xxxxx-------x-xx-x-] 
> Jiang Long (Mentor Graphics)  
> n[--------------x------------x--xxx.....................] Joseph Lu
> (Altera)
>  v[x-x--xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx..............................] 
> Johan Martensson (Jasper)  
> n[--------------------------------x--x-xx--xx-xxxxxxx-x-] 
> Hillel Miller
> (Freescale)
>  v[xxxxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx] Lisa Piper
> (Cadence)
>  v[-xxxxxxxxxx-x-x-xx-xxxxxxx-x-xxxxx-x..................] 
> Erik Seligman
> (Intel)
>  n[------------x-x----x--------xxxx-----xxxx-xx----------] 
> Tej Singh (Mentor Graphics)  
> v[-xxx-xxxxxx-x-xxxxxx--xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Bassam Tabbara (Synopsys)  
> v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxx...............] Tom 
> Thatcher (Sun Microsystems)
>    |------------------------------------------------------ 
> attendance on
> 2008-02-19
>  |-------------------------------------------------------- 
> voting eligibility for this ballot
> |--------------------------------------------------------- 
> e-mail votes
> received
> 
>         Legend:
>                 x = attended
>                 - = missed
>                 r = represented
>                 . = not yet a member
>                 v = valid voter (2 out of last 3 or 3/4 overall)
>                 n = not a valid voter
>                 t = chair eligible to vote only to make or break a tie
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous 
> content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- This message has been scanned for viruses anddangerous content by MailScanner, and isbelieved to be clean.