RE: [sv-ac] call to vote on 1769

From: Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce_at_.....>
Date: Sun Feb 24 2008 - 10:51:42 PST
Shalom,

I'm not an ontologist, but if the $display could only control what
happened during elaboration and we're not part of the code to be
simulated, sure, to me it would be a declaration.

I was just trying to keep our BNF a little simpler than proposed.

-- Brad  


-----Original Message-----
From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] 
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 1:10 AM
To: Brad Pierce; sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] call to vote on 1769

Brad, 

> 1.  It is a declaration of an elaboration time messager.

Would you also call a $display statement a declaration?

 
> 2.  A module_or_generate_item_declaration can appear in the same 
> places as the conditional and loop generate constructs.

True. But if they appear separately in the BNF, I don't see why an
elaboration message construct should not appear with them rather than
with declarations.

Shalom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Sun Feb 24 10:52:13 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 24 2008 - 10:53:04 PST