RE: [sv-ac] call to vote on 1900

<forwarding bounced email - from dmitry.korchemny@intel.com>


> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Subject: RE: [sv-ac] call to vote on 1900
> From: "Korchemny, Dmitry" <dmitry.korchemny@intel.com>
> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:30:25 +0200
> To: Bassam Tabbara <Bassam.Tabbara@synopsys.com>, sv-ac@server.eda.org 
> 
> Hi Bassam,
> 
> Could you, please, point to specific inconsistencies between the text 
> and the BNF? 
> 
> Thanks,
> Dmitry
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> *From:* owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] 
> *On Behalf Of *Bassam Tabbara
> *Sent:* Saturday, February 16, 2008 6:30 PM
> *To:* sv-ac@server.eda.org
> *Subject:* RE: [sv-ac] call to vote on 1900 
> 
> I vote yes, but conditional on clarifying/fixing the BNF. It has 
> shortcomings on where checkers are declared and instantiated -- the text 
> says something not reflected in BNF.
> 
> Note that 2182 (VPI) may also need to be updated based on this review of 
> where declared/instantiated.
> 
> Thx.
> -Bassam.  
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.