RE: [sv-ac] keywords in 2100

Perhaps accept_sync / reject_sync would be a little less wordy?

 

________________________________

From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of Fais Yaniv
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 10:52 AM
To: sv-ac@server.eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] keywords in 2100

 

Hi All,

currently the proposal for 2100 states that the keyword for the
synchronous aborts is accept_if and reject_if as oppose to the
asynchronous aborts accept_on and reject_on,

Erik has wondered if we could find a better keyword which would be more
meaningful in expressing the difference between those abort types.

Doron has suggested sync_accept_on and sync_reject_on , is that accepted
? any other ideas ??

 

Yaniv

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.