Hi Folks: The request below comes from Neil and Mehdi in SV-EC. Please send me input on what further SV-AC Mantis items are expected to require SV-EC review. I would like to have this information by the end of the day on 2008-02-12 (sorry for late notice). J.H. ------- Start of forwarded message ------- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:54:38 -0800 From: Neil Korpusik <Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM> Subject: Re: [sv-ec] please review 2088 Sender: Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM To: john.havlicek@freescale.com Cc: Mehdi Mohtashemi <Mehdi.Mohtashemi@synopsys.com> Reply-to: Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Feb 2008 22:54:43.0252 (UTC) FILETIME=[6D98EF40:01C869DC] Hi John, Mehdi and I were wondering if you are expecting the sv-ac to want the sv-ec to review any additional mantis items. If there are additional Mantis items we are inclined to wait for notification on the rest of them before taking action. The next sv-ec conference call won't be until early March. We are considering an email vote on those Mantis items that the sv-ac would like to have reviewed. Having the complete list would allow us to place all of them on a single email ballot. Let us know if it makes sense for us to wait for more or if it makes more sense for us to proceed right away with 2088. Neil John Havlicek wrote: > Hi SV-EC: > > SV-AC have approved the following request in our meeting 2008-02-05: > > SV-AC request that SV-EC review and approve the latest revision to 2088. > SV-AC are concurrently voting on this revision. > > The document on Mantis is > > 2088_covergroups_20080205.pdf > > J.H. > > ------- End of forwarded message ------- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Feb 11 09:38:48 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 11 2008 - 09:38:58 PST