Lisa, you are probably right, in the context of BNF it shows it as a call, not in the assignment. So probably clear enough. ed ________________________________ From: Lisa Piper [mailto:piper@cadence.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 11:07 AM To: Eduard Cerny Cc: john.havlicek@freescale.com; sv-ac@eda.org Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 1686 I don't know. In the previous section it defines: sequence_match_item ::= operator_assignment | inc_or_dec_expression | subroutine_call What you refer to below is the operator assignment. This is the subroutine call (standalone). Let me know if you still think a change is desired. I think your proposed change is equivalent so I don't have an issue with changing it. Lisa From: Eduard Cerny [mailto:Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:16 AM To: Lisa Piper; john.havlicek@freescale.com Cc: sv-ac@eda.org Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 1686 Hi Lisa, I think that we have a problem with the use of the word "subroutine". I think that it should be replaced by "task and void functions". The reason is that in 13.2, it states: "Tasks and functions are collectively referred to as subroutines" However, functions can be used on the rhs of assignments to local variables. So they are also called, no? Best regards, ed ________________________________ From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Lisa Piper Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 5:53 AM To: Lisa Piper; john.havlicek@freescale.com Cc: sv-ac@eda.org Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 1686 Looks like I forgot the attachment. Sorry - here it is. lisa ________________________________ From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Lisa Piper Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 5:21 AM To: john.havlicek@freescale.com Cc: sv-ac@eda.org Subject: [sv-ac] 1686 Hi John, Here is the proposal for 1686. It is really really simple so hopefully you can review and send for vote. I am putting the source and PDF on Mantis. Lisa -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Feb 6 08:38:17 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 06 2008 - 08:38:25 PST