RE: [sv-ac] 2005 review by other committees

From: Seligman, Erik <erik.seligman_at_.....>
Date: Mon Feb 04 2008 - 07:13:38 PST
We probably need the SV-CC to take a look due to the minor API addition:
isDeferred field for assertions.
But since deferred assertions don't actually affect any non-assertion
features, do we need other reviews? 

(Also remember that DougW and GordV both participated heavily in the
definition, so there has been some level of external review already.)

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of John Havlicek
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 7:20 AM
To: sv-ac@server.eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] 2005 review by other committees

Folks:

What other committees, if any, need to review 2005?

J.H.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Feb 4 07:25:04 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 04 2008 - 07:25:25 PST