RE: [sv-ac] Mantis 1698

From: Lisa Piper <piper_at_.....>
Date: Tue Jan 29 2008 - 10:20:18 PST
That is what I started with but then had to get rid of all references to
synthesis. I thought I was combining the last sentence into the first
sentence, but I ended up losing it.  Does this work?

 

Regardless where $past(x,,,@clk) is called from, the RTL equivalent is

 

     always @clk past_variable <= $sampled(x);

 

and executes in the active region.

 

If $past is called from active, reactive or observed regions, replace

the call by $sampled(past_variable).

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Eduard Cerny
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 12:32 PM
To: sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] Mantis 1698

 

Hi to start the discussion, I copy here the note I put on mantis 1698

quite a while ago. Could that be used?

 

---

Regardless where $past(x,,,@clk) is called from, the RTL equivalent is

 

always @clk past_variable <= $sampled(x);

 

and executes in the active region.

 

If $past is called from active, reactive or observed regions, replace

the call by $sampled(past_variable).

 

In synthesized code which executes in the active region, use the

past_variable directly. Provided that the model follows synthesis rules

and is not racy, the behavior should be equivalent to that in the

original model using $past.

 

The other functions, $rose, $fell and $stable would follow. 

 

----

 

Best...

ed

 

-- 

This message has been scanned for viruses and

dangerous content by MailScanner, and is

believed to be clean.

 

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Jan 29 10:21:25 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 29 2008 - 10:21:41 PST