All, I got some feedback from Yaniv that consider vpi diagrams. I do not feel comfortable with vpi and need some help. Due to the tight time schedule I would like to move the vpi part of 1932 to a new mantis item 2250. Bassam, could you help me with the issues Yaniv rise? I am not sure what to do. If people will not object to the separation of vpi from 1932, we can voice vote on it in the next meeting. Thanks Doron >> >> I vote yes on 1932 with the following friendly amendments: >> >>1. add to "36.45 Property specification" and "M.2 Source code" vpi codes >>for weak,iff,implies >> >>4. This enhancement adds additional operand types to property >>expression,e.g: the cycle_delay_const_range_expression in >> >>always [cycle_delay_const_range_expression] property_expr , currently >>only property-expression or sequence-expression operands exist in >>property-expression, are those additional operand types accessible from >>the VPI ? (I'm sorry but I don't know enough about VPI to answer >>this...) >> >> >> >>Yaniv -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun Jan 27 05:16:23 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jan 27 2008 - 05:17:00 PST