RE: [sv-ac] New proposals to review

Hi all,

 

We still need reviewers for 2168 and 2069.

 

Thanks,

Dmitry

 

________________________________

From: Fais Yaniv [mailto:yaniv.fais@freescale.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 4:46 PM
To: Korchemny, Dmitry; sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] New proposals to review

 

 

please sign me as a reviewer for 2100

 

Thanks,

Yaniv

 

 

________________________________

From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Korchemny, Dmitry
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 16:41
To: sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] New proposals to review

Hi all,

 

I had an action item to find reviewers for the following proposals:

 

*         2168 "Formal semantics for edge-sensitive clocks"

 

Clarification that in SVA the clocks are edge sensitive and in the
formal semantics described in Annex F the clocks are level sensitive. A
formal translation procedure from the first form into the second one is
proposed.

 

This proposal was discussed in the past, but now it requires a formal
review before the voting

 

*         2069 "Formal semantics for coverage is missing"

 

Description of global semantics of assertion and cover statements.
Changes in Annex F only.

 

*         2100 "Add synchronous resets syntax as oppose to the
asynchronous nature of accept_on/reject_on"

 

New operators accept_if and reject_if proposed to represent synchronous
aborts.

 

 

Who would volunteer to review these proposals?

 

Thanks,

Dmitry

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.