RE: [sv-ac] Mantis 1648

Hi Shalom,

 

I don't have any issues with these requested changes.  

 

Lisa

 

________________________________

From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Bresticker, Shalom
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 10:23 AM
To: sv-champions@eda.org
Cc: sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] Mantis 1648

 

Mantis 1648 adds the following in 16.15: 

Furthermore, the default extends to any nested module, interface, or
program declarations. 

I think that sentence should include nested generate blocks as well. 

The effect of a default disable iff item is independent of the position
of the declaration within that scope. 

For consistency, I think "item" should be "declaration" here. 

Declaring more than one default disable iff item within the same module,
interface, program declaration, or generate scope shall be an error.

I think 'generate scope' should be 'generate block'. 

// Disable condition is rst - no explicit specification, inferred from 
// default disable statement 
I think the 2nd line of the comment should be 
// default disable iff declaration 

Shalom 

Shalom Bresticker 
Intel Jerusalem LAD DA 
+972 2 589-6582 
+972 54 721-1033 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.