RE: [sv-ac] 16.12 "in disabled"

Precisely. That statement uses the term 'disabled evaluation'. It does
not use 'disabled' as a standalone term.
 
Furthermore, the way that next statement is worded and formatted, it
looks and sounds like 'disabled' is being used as a verb, i.e., the
property has performed the action of disabling the evaluation, not using
'disabled' as an adjective modifying the word 'evaluation'.
 
Shalom


________________________________

	From: Korchemny, Dmitry 
	Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 4:44 PM
	To: Bresticker, Shalom; 'sv-ac@server.eda.org'
	Cc: 'stuart@sutherland-hdl.com'
	Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 16.12 "in disabled"
	
	

	I think that the next statement explains exactly what "disabled"
means:

	 

	"A property has disabled evaluation if it was preempted due to a
disable iff condition."

	 

	But probably it needs some clarification.

	 

	Dmitry

	 

	
________________________________


	From: Bresticker, Shalom 
	Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 4:40 PM
	To: Korchemny, Dmitry; 'sv-ac@server.eda.org'
	Cc: 'stuart@sutherland-hdl.com'
	Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 16.12 "in disabled"

	 

	This is the first time the word 'disabled' appears in Clause 16.

	You would have to say something like 'results in a "disabled"
status.'

	 

	Shalom

		 

		
________________________________


		From: Korchemny, Dmitry 
		Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 4:38 PM
		To: Bresticker, Shalom; 'sv-ac@server.eda.org'
		Cc: 'stuart@sutherland-hdl.com'
		Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 16.12 "in disabled"

		It says that the property evaluation status is
"disabled":

		 

		The evaluation results in "disabled".

		 

		Dmitry

		 

		
________________________________


		From: Bresticker, Shalom 
		Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 4:35 PM
		To: Korchemny, Dmitry; 'sv-ac@server.eda.org'
		Cc: 'stuart@sutherland-hdl.com'
		Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 16.12 "in disabled"

		 

		As it is does not make sense. An additional word would
have to follow 'disabled'.

		 

		Shalom

			 

			
________________________________


			From: Korchemny, Dmitry 
			Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 4:33 PM
			To: Bresticker, Shalom; sv-ac@server.eda.org
			Cc: stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
			Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 16.12 "in disabled"

			Hi Shalom,

			 

			I think it should either be as it is or "...
result is disabled".

			 

			Regards,

			Dmitry

			 

			
________________________________


			From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org
[mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
			Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 4:28 PM
			To: sv-ac@server.eda.org
			Cc: stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
			Subject: [sv-ac] 16.12 "in disabled"

			 

			Hi, 

			16.12 has a sentence (as amended by Mantis
1648): 

			"If prior to the completion of that evaluation
the disable condition becomes true, then the overall evaluation of the
property results in disabled."

			That looks a little funny. 
			Should the end of the sentence be "is disabled"?


			Thanks, 
			Shalom 

			Shalom Bresticker 
			Intel Jerusalem LAD DA 
			+972 2 589-6582 
			+972 54 721-1033 

	
---------------------------------------------------------------------
			Intel Israel (74) Limited
			 
			This e-mail and any attachments may contain
confidential material for
			the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any
review or distribution
			by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not
the intended
			recipient, please contact the sender and delete
all copies.

			
			-- 
			This message has been scanned for viruses and 
			dangerous content by MailScanner
<http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is 
			believed to be clean. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.