I have confirmed mine as well. -----Original Message----- From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Thatcher Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 10:34 AM To: john.havlicek@freescale.com Cc: sv-ac@server.eda.org Subject: [sv-ac] Re: confirm friendly amendments for 1682 Hi John, My friendly amendments were incorporated. Tom John Havlicek wrote: > Hi Erik, Tom: > > You had friendly amendments to 1682, which was passed > on 2007-12-24. > > Dmitry says that these have been incorporated. Please > check the latest proposal and send e-mail to confirm. > > J.H. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- > Friendly Amendments > > [ES] > > Minor friendly amendment though: > "Callback execution for assertions referring global clocking future > value functions" ==> > "Callback execution for assertions referring to global clocking future > value functions" > > [TT] > > I think that the text describing the example for 38.4.2.1 > really needs a figure to illustrate it. It's a little hard to follow > the text: > "Suppose that clk rises at simulation time 10, 30, 50 . . ." -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Jan 9 07:12:27 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 09 2008 - 07:13:06 PST