Hi Folks: Our ballot on 2089 failed due to negative vote. See the results below. J.H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ballot on Mantis 2089 - Called on 2007-12-20, final ballots due by 2007-12-30 T 23:59-08:00. yv[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xx] Doron Bustan (Intel) yv[xxx--xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-x] Eduard Cerny (Synopsys) n[--------------------x-xxx---------x-x-xxx-x---x] Surrendra Dudani (Synopsys) yv[xxxxxx-xxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx-xx-xxxxx-xxx-xxx-------] Yaniv Fais (Freescale) t[xx--xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] John Havlicek (Freescale - Chair) nv[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxrxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxx] Dmitry Korchemny (Intel - Co-Chair) v[xxx-xxxxxxxxx-xxx-x--xx--xxxxx----------xx-xxxx] Manisha Kulshrestha (Mentor Graphics) n[----------------------------xxxxx-------x-xx-x-] Jiang Long (Mentor Graphics) n[-------x------------x--xxx.....................] Joseph Lu (Altera) v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx..............................] Johan Martensson (Jasper) n[-------------------------x--x-xx--xx-xxxxxxx-x-] Hillel Miller (Freescale) v[xxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx] Lisa Piper (Cadence) yv[xxxx-x-x-xx-xxxxxxx-x-xxxxx-x..................] Erik Seligman (Intel) n[-----x-x----x--------xxxx-----xxxx-xx----------] Tej Singh (Mentor Graphics) yv[xxxx-x-xxxxxx--xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Bassam Tabbara (Synopsys) yv[xxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxx...............] Tom Thatcher (Sun Microsystems) |----------------------------------------------- attendance on 2007-12-18 |------------------------------------------------- voting eligibility for this ballot |-------------------------------------------------- email ballots received Legend: x = attended - = missed r = represented . = not yet a member v = valid voter (2 out of last 3 or 3/4 overall) n = not a valid voter t = chair eligible to vote only to make or break a tie ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rationale for Negative Vote [DK] * A refinement of "checker body" is needed. Currently "checker body" is defined as everything in the checker except of assertion action blocks. Apparently, final procedure imposes different limitations than other stuff from "checker body" does. This also includes the argument passing: if a formal argument is used in a final procedure, a corresponding actual argument cannot depend on checker variables, etc.=20 * Do you want to make a declaration of regular variables legal in checkers since they may be used in final procedures, or shall they remain illegal, and the variables used in final procedures should be declared there locally (I prefer the latter option)? This needs to be explicitly mentioned. * Friendly amendment: The new text should be in Times New Roman, and not in Arial (page 3). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Friendly Amendments [BT] - Add pointer to 2182 for VPI - Remove mention of VPI "may need change" -- "final" is covered in "process" -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Dec 31 09:06:34 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 31 2007 - 09:06:43 PST