Hi John, My comments for part 1 below: 1. page 3,item before last: "It shall be an error if the local variable formal argument is unassigned at the completion of a match of the instance of the named sequence." It read like a run time test? I would like an elaboration time criteria that determine whether an instantiation is legal. 2. I think that there should be a little bit more text connecting the new Use of local variables with local formal arguments and the "old style" where local variables are used as actual arguments to un-typed variables. 3. A general comment that applies to both part1 and part2: I think that we need a restriction that disallow using the same reference to local variable as an actual argument to more then one formal argument of direction/output/inout. The current definition define a non deterministic outcome according to the order of the assignments in the match item list. I don't have more comments for part2. Doron >>-----Original Message----- >>From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On >>Behalf Of John Havlicek >>Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 8:35 PM >>To: sv-ac@server.eda.org >>Subject: [sv-ac] part 1 of 1667 >> >>Hi Folks: >> >>I'm not sure if the attachment was too big, so I >>am sending this note without attachment. >> >>I have uploaded part 1 (non-Annex-F) of the proposal >>for 1667 to Mantis. >> >>I believe that Doron and Ed volunteered to review it. >> >>I will now begin work on the Annex F changes. >> >>J.H. >> >>-- >>This message has been scanned for viruses and >>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >>believed to be clean. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Dec 31 04:02:21 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 31 2007 - 04:03:07 PST