[sv-ac] review 1683

From: John Havlicek <john.havlicek_at_.....>
Date: Mon Dec 17 2007 - 17:35:56 PST

Hi Folks:

I have read through the proposal for 1683 and I did not 
see any technical issues that would delay voting on it.

There were some minor English editorial issues, but I did
not bother to note them.

J.H.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Received on Mon Dec 17 20:50:42 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Kulshrestha, Manisha: "RE: [sv-ac] call to vote on 1900"
Previous message: Bresticker, Shalom: "RE: [sv-ac] Revised version of proposal 2005 (deferred assertions)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 17 2007 - 20:51:04 PST