RE: [sv-ac] 1683 uploaded

Hi Dmitry,

 

I have a question:  You state

 

 "Changing clock clk1 to clock clk2 with zero delay has the following
meaning: wait for the tick of clk1 and

then wait for the nearest tick @clk2, i.e., if the tick of clk2 happens
at the same time as the tick of clk1,

there is no waiting after clk1 tick, if the ticks of clk1 and clk2 do
not happen simultaneously, the next tick

of clk2 after clk1 is awaited."

 

So does that mean that the operators |-> and |=> have the same meaning
when clk1 and clk2 do not happen simultaneously?

 

Lisa

 

________________________________

From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Korchemny, Dmitry
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 5:49 PM
To: sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] 1683 uploaded

 

Hi all,

 

I uploaded the updated version of the proposal (subclause name changed).

 

Thanks,

Dmitry

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.