[sv-ac] Assertion clocks in checkers

Hi Lisa,

 

I had an action item to add the following note to the checker proposal:

 

*	DK: to add a comment that if there is no inferred event for
assertions in checkers, there should be an explicit event specified
(1900) 

 

Upon some rethinking I began to wonder whether we need this note at all.
It is explicitly stated in 16.15

 

If a concurrent assertion statement has no explicit leading clocking
event, there is no default clocking

event, and no contextually inferred clocking event applies to the
assertion statement, then the

maximal property of the assertion statement must be an instance of a
sequence or property for which

a unique leading clocking event is determined.

 

Why do we need to repeat this note in the checker proposal?

 

What do you think?

 

Thanks,

Dmitry

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.