Hi Daniel, The definition is correct: and is non-vacuous if either of its operands is non-vacuous. It is the same definition as for or. Regards, Dmitry ________________________________ From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of danielm Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 5:49 PM To: sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org Subject: [sv-ac] 1381: vacuous on "AND" operator The description of vacuous evaluation for AND operator is exactly the same as for OR operator - it looks for me like clasic copy&paste error: There is: "an evaluation attempt of a property of the form prop_expr1 and prop_expr2 is non-vacuous iff either the underlying evaluation attempt of prop_expr1 is non-vacuous or either the underlying evaluation attempt of prop_expr2 is non-vacuous." IMHO there should be: "an evaluation attempt of a property of the form prop_expr1 and prop_expr2 is non-vacuous iff both the underlying evaluation attempt of prop_expr1 and propr_expr2 is non-vacuous" DANiel -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Nov 27 07:54:05 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 27 2007 - 07:54:22 PST