All, These are the the changes with substance that I made according to the friendly amendmnts: * At table 16-25 I lowered "accept_on/reject_on" to the bottom of the table. * At 16.12.3 I have change The operators accept_on and reject_on are evaluated at the granularity of the simulation time step like disable iff but the abort condition is being evaluated as a regular boolean expression in assertions, meaning, its sampled value is being evaluated at the observed region. They represent asynchronous resets. To The operators accept_on and reject_on are evaluated at the granularity of the simulation time step like disable iff but their abort condition is evaluated using sampled value as a regular boolean expression in assertions. The operators accept_on and reject_on represent asynchronous resets. * I added a third billet to the two bullets below it another bullet: * While a disable condition of a disable iff in a property_spec may cause an evaluation of the property_spec to be disabled, an abort condition of accept_on in a property_expr may cause the evaluation of the property_expr to be true. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Nov 27 07:17:42 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 27 2007 - 07:18:16 PST