[sv-ac] 1757

From: Bustan, Doron <doron.bustan_at_.....>
Date: Tue Nov 27 2007 - 07:16:03 PST
All,

These are the the changes with substance that I made according to the
friendly amendmnts:

* At table 16-25 I lowered "accept_on/reject_on" to the bottom of the
table.

 

* At 16.12.3 I have change

The operators accept_on and reject_on are evaluated at the granularity
of the simulation time step like disable iff but the abort condition is
being evaluated as a regular boolean expression in assertions, meaning,
its sampled value is being evaluated at the observed region. They
represent asynchronous resets.

 

To

 

The operators accept_on and reject_on are evaluated at the granularity
of the simulation time step like disable iff but their abort condition
is evaluated using sampled value as a regular boolean expression in
assertions. The operators accept_on and reject_on represent asynchronous
resets.

 

* I added a third billet to the two bullets below it another bullet:

 

*      While a disable condition of a disable iff in a property_spec may
cause an evaluation of the property_spec to be disabled, an abort
condition of accept_on in a property_expr may cause the evaluation of
the property_expr to be true.

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Nov 27 07:17:42 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 27 2007 - 07:18:16 PST