Just after giving up, it came to me, so I gave it one more try. Attached is the latest. The new text in question that I was re-writing is below. I have uploaded the proposal to Mantis. If this looks ok then it is ready to vote. Lisa <<1648_default_disable_071120_jh_lp.pdf>> A default disable iff may be declared within a generate block locally or within a module, interface, or program declaration. It provides a default disable condition to all concurrent assertions in the scope and subscopes of the default disable iff declaration. Furthermore, the default extends to any nested module, interface, or program declarations. However, if a nested module, interface, or program declaration, or a local generate block itself has a default disable iff declaration, then that default disable iff applies within the nested declaration or local generate block and overrides any default disable iff from outside. Any signals referenced in the disable iff item that are resolved using scopes will be resolved from the scope of the declaration. The effect of a default disable iff item is independent of the position of the declaration within that scope. Declaring more than one default disable iff item within the same module, interface, program declaration, or generate scope shall be an error. The scope does not extend into any instances of modules, interfaces or programs. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 20 2007 - 19:18:04 PST