RE: [sv-ac] inconsistency in "default clocking" terminology

Yes, it looks good. Though I personally liked the "specification
statement" more than just "specification", since this specification is
indeed a statement.

 

--Yulik.

 

________________________________

From: Lisa Piper [mailto:piper@cadence.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 3:52 PM
To: Feldman, Yulik; sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] inconsistency in "default clocking" terminology

 

1648 is already fixing this section so I added this to that proposal.
Please confirm that the following addresses your concern and I will
upload the proposal to Mantis.

 

Lisa

=====================

 

14.12 Default clocking

REPLACE in Syntax 14-3-Default clocking syntax

 

The syntax for the default cycle specification statement is as follows:

 

module_or_generate_item_declaration ::= // from A.1.4
              ...
            | default clocking clocking_identifier ;

WITH

The syntax for default clocking specification the default cycle
specification statement is as follows:

 

module_or_generate_item_declaration ::= // from A.1.4

         ...
            | default clocking clocking_identifier ; ;

         ...

[Note to the Editor:  There are two changes in the syntax itself.  One
is to change the font of the terminating semicolon from non-bold black
to bold red.  The other is to add the ellipsis (...) at the end to
represent the omission of "default disable iff", which is not relevant
in this context.] 

 

 

________________________________

From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Feldman, Yulik
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 5:09 AM
To: sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] inconsistency in "default clocking" terminology

 

FYI,

 

In 1800/D4, 14.12 "Default clocking", the "default clocking" is referred
to once as "default cycle specification statement" and once as "default
clocking specification". The terminology should be consistent. The
"cycle" is a clear typo, but there should also be consistency in whether
it is a "specification statement" or just a "specification".

 

--Yulik.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.