Hi Folks: Below are my notes from yesterday's Champions' meeting regarding SV-AC items. This is just a heads up. This is not the official feedback from Champions. J.H. 1758 SV-AC Boolean implication -> and equivalence <-> - Friendly Amendment: The changes to 11.4.7 should be to 11.4.8 in D4. - SV-BC need to review this. - SV-CC need to review this. 1728 SV-AC Introduce "let" statement - Comments from Shalom on missing parentheses -- see the note on Mantis. - Example e) should have "input bit clock". Also check mismatch of "logic c, d" to "bit c, d". Review all examples. - SV-CC need to review this. 1668 SV-AC Local variable initializers. - Need to make the references to the new subclauses clearer -- use their titles. - Clearly identify the two documents that are part of the proposal. 1549 SV-AC add missing formal argument types - Need to make the references to the new subclauses clearer -- use their titles. - Clearly identify the two documents that are part of the proposal. - Footnotes need to be moved into body text to be normative. - The check for illegal parentheses is unusual. - Try to make a single definition for cyclic dependency. - Consider adding $ into constant primary. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Nov 9 12:14:49 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 09 2007 - 12:15:16 PST