Thanks, Lisa. It looks OK now. Dmitry ________________________________ From: Lisa Piper [mailto:piper@cadence.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 4:21 PM To: Korchemny, Dmitry; john.havlicek@freescale.com Cc: sv-ac@eda.org Subject: RE: [sv-ac] ballot result on 1737 Thanks Dmitry, I have removed the quotes and fixed that remaining font issue. I am uploading to Mantis now. Lisa ________________________________ From: Korchemny, Dmitry [mailto:dmitry.korchemny@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 2:46 AM To: Lisa Piper; john.havlicek@freescale.com Cc: sv-ac@eda.org Subject: RE: [sv-ac] ballot result on 1737 Hi Lisa, I noticed one more minor issue on page 5. I don't think that the expression "!bit'(a!='b0)" needs to be quoted, but in any case the quote font should match. I wrote some other comments below. Thanks, Dmitry ________________________________ From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Lisa Piper Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 8:10 PM To: john.havlicek@freescale.com; Korchemny, Dmitry Cc: sv-ac@server.eda.org Subject: RE: [sv-ac] ballot result on 1737 Hi all, I believe I have incorporated all comments. Dmitry please see my response to your comments below. I think I responded separately to the others already. The word source and the PDF are on Mantis. Also, I have deleted old versions. Lisa [DK] Page 4. "If the bit variables in the previous examples are replaced with a logic variables" --> "If the bit variables in the previous examples are replaced with logic variables", also logic should be in bold courier 9. [Lisa Piper >>>] This required some additional change. The bit array was changed to a bit based on earlier comments so it should have been: "If the bit variable in the previous example is replaced with a logic variable, the assertions embedded in the else clause require different semantics." I also had to add back the bit variable in the previous example. And I also put bit in bold courier 9. Also, I noticed that many of my keywords in the text were of size 10, so I have changed them to a 9. Later in this statement: "else clause", "else" should be in bold courier 9. [Lisa Piper >>>] done "r1, r2, r3, and r4 are property_expr". r1, r2, r3, and r4 should be in courier 9, property_expr should be in italic. Same note regarding page 5. [Lisa Piper >>>] done. I also put disable iff in bold courier 9 in that sentence. "that s1 and s2 are sequence_expr, and the code is as follows". s1 and s2 should be in bold courier 9, sequence_expr should be in italic. Same note regarding page 5. [Lisa Piper >>>] I don't think they should be in bold because they are not keywords (which is consistent with your previous comment on property r1-r4) but I did change it to courier 9. [Korchemny, Dmitry] Sure, they should not be in bold, sorry for the blind cut and paste. But on the page 4 r4, s1 and s2 are still not in courier. "The equivalent code must account for 4-state semantics of "a"." a should be in courier 9 without quotes. [Lisa Piper >>>] done Page 5. " length of "a"" a should be in courier 9 without quotes. [Lisa Piper >>>] done --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Nov 7 07:33:22 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 07 2007 - 07:33:37 PST