Re: [sv-ac] call to vote on 1648

Hi Dave:

On 2007-10-04, P1800 WG set a deadline of 2007-10-24 for the other
SV-* committees to give feedback to SV-AC on what they wanted to 
do with 1648.

I meant there was no delaying feedback on 1648 from the other
committees submitted by that deadline.

Remember that if you want to add semantics to "default disable"
in the future, you will be able to add a syntactic variation
(an option, e.g.).

If there is semantics you want to add for the plain "default disable",
please try to crystallize the ideas into a sketch of the technical 
substance as soon as possible.  

If you are willing to work with us on it during the extension period,
then you could even add a mantis item for this under SV-AC and we
can put it on our list.

J.H.

> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 14:03:56 -0700
> X-MS-Has-Attach: 
> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
> Thread-Topic: [sv-ac] call to vote on 1648
> Thread-Index: AcgaTLkbMm62pNfaTiGIkLROnuJcugEEAzZw
> From: "Rich, Dave" <Dave_Rich@mentor.com>
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Nov 2007 21:03:58.0620 (UTC) FILETIME=[0D6E8DC0:01C81E5D]
> 
> That's not true.
> 
> Since the SV-AC has an extra 2 months on their deadline, we decided to
> delay our feedback to the AC until after our deadline.
> 
> Dave
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org]
> On
> > Behalf Of John Havlicek
> > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 9:55 AM
> > To: sv-ac@server.eda.org
> > Subject: [sv-ac] call to vote on 1648
> >=20
> > Hi Folks:
> >=20
> > There was no delaying feedback on 1648 from the other
> > committees, so this is the call to vote on the revised
> > proposal.
> >=20
> > The document on Mantis is
> >=20
> >    1648_default_disable_071001_ec_bt.pdf
> >=20
> > Please vote if you are eligible.  See the details below.
> >=20
> > J.H.
> >=20
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > --------
> > Ballot on Mantis 1648
> >=20
> > - Called on 2007-10-29, final ballots due by 2007-11-05 T 23:59-08:00.
> >=20
> >  v[xxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xx] Doron Bustan (Intel)
> >  v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-x] Eduard Cerny (Synopsys)
> >  n[------------x-xxx---------x-x-xxx-x---x] Surrendra Dudani
> (Synopsys)
> >  v[xxxxx-xxxxxxxxx-xx-xxxxx-xxx-xxx-------] Yaniv Fais (Freescale)
> >  t[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] John Havlicek (Freescale -
> > Chair)
> >  v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxrxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxx] Dmitry Korchemny (Intel -
> Co-
> > Chair)
> >  v[xxxxx-xxx-x--xx--xxxxx----------xx-xxxx] Manisha Kulshrestha
> (Mentor
> > Graphics)
> >  n[--------------------xxxxx-------x-xx-x-] Jiang Long (Mentor
> Graphics)
> >  n[------------x--xxx.....................] Joseph Lu (Altera)
> >  v[xxxxxxxxx..............................] Johan Martensson (Jasper)
> >  n[-----------------x--x-xx--xx-xxxxxxx-x-] Hillel Miller (Freescale)
> >  v[-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx] Lisa Piper (Cadence)
> >  v[-xx-xxxxxxx-x-xxxxx-x..................] Erik Seligman (Intel)
> >  n[----x--------xxxx-----xxxx-xx----------] Tej Singh (Mentor
> Graphics)
> >  v[xxxxx--xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Bassam Tabbara (Synopsys)
> >  v[xxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxx...............] Tom Thatcher (Sun
> > Microsystems)
> >    |--------------------------------------- attendance on 2007-10-23
> >  |----------------------------------------- voting eligibility for
> this
> > ballot
> > |------------------------------------------ email ballots received
> >=20
> >         Legend:
> >                 x =3D attended
> >                 - =3D missed
> >                 r =3D represented
> >                 . =3D not yet a member
> >                 v =3D valid voter (2 out of last 3 or 3/4 overall)
> >                 n =3D not a valid voter
> >                 t =3D chair eligible to vote only to make or break a =
> tie
> >=20
> >=20
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.