Hi Johan, >> 1) There is still an occurrence of the non terminal const_expression >> that doesn't seem to occur in D4. (In the second case for next). [DB:] I hope I fixed all of them now. >> 2) Why is the non terminal const_or_range_expression used in s_always >> and eventually instead of cycle_delay_const_range_expression which is >> used in always and s_eventually? Is the intention to allow s_always[n] >> but not always[n] for example? I think only two number ranges should be >> allowed in always, s_always, s_eventually and eventually. We already >> have s_next[n] for expressing s_always[n] and next[n] for expressing >> eventually[n]. [DB:] I changed the definitions s_always and eventually cannot have a range with $ inside it. Regards Doron --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun Nov 4 06:29:19 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Nov 04 2007 - 06:29:26 PST