Re: [sv-ac] meeting time

From: John Havlicek <john.havlicek_at_.....>
Date: Thu Nov 01 2007 - 03:51:17 PDT
Hi Folks:

There has been significant demand for us to keep the same 
starting UTC (16:00) for our meetings, so this is what we
will do.

Therefore, our next meeting is at 16:00 UTC on 2007-11-06.

J.H.

> X-ExtLoop1: 1
> X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,356,1188802800"; 
>    d="scan'208";a="364936373"
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 10:01:56 +0200
> X-MS-Has-Attach: 
> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
> Thread-Topic: [sv-ac] meeting time
> Thread-Index: AcgbNGA/RMiTyk2ASxyWSJ/F+T3+rwBEgvFQAAJUlDAAA2vYgA==
> From: "Korchemny, Dmitry" <dmitry.korchemny@intel.com>
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Nov 2007 08:02:07.0402 (UTC) FILETIME=[7F5740A0:01C81C5D]
> 
> For me too,
> 
> Dmitry
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On
> Behalf Of Bustan, Doron
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 8:25 AM
> To: Kulshrestha, Manisha; john.havlicek@freescale.com;
> sv-ac@server.eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ac] meeting time
> 
> It also will be good for me=20
> 
> Doron
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On
> Behalf Of Kulshrestha, Manisha
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 7:25 AM
> To: john.havlicek@freescale.com; sv-ac@server.eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ac] meeting time
> 
> Hi John,
> 
> Will it be possible to shift the time of this meeting to 1 hour earlier
> ? It is already 9:30PM - 11:30PM here for the current time and with
> daylight ending it will be 10:30PM to 12:30PM.
> 
> Thanks.
> Manisha
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On
> Behalf Of John Havlicek
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 1:30 AM
> To: sv-ac@server.eda.org
> Subject: [sv-ac] meeting time
> 
> Hi Folks:
> 
> I'm sorry we got cut off at the end.
> 
> I didn't realize that someone had booked back-to-back
> in the conference room.
> 
> The meeting time that I sent out in the notes is inconsistent:
> 
> > Next meeting:=20
> > -------------
> >=20
> > 2007-11-06 at 17:00 UTC (10:00 CST), 2 hour slot.
> 
> I was vascillating between keeping the UTC the same or keeping
> the US local time (in most places) the same.  In the end I did
> neither!
> 
> Let's stick with the 17:00 UTC, which is 11:00 CST, for 2007-11-06.
> We can discuss whether or not to shift the time for the following
> meeting.
> 
> J=2EH.
> 
> 
> --=20
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> --=20
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> 
> --=20
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Nov 1 03:51:51 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 01 2007 - 03:51:58 PDT