Re: [sv-ac] friendly amendments to 1641

Hi Manisha:

This is a reminder that we are expecting another revision of 1641.

We will need to decide whether this should have another e-mail ballot
or whether the changes are minor and a voice vote is appropriate.

J.H.

> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:40:30 -0700
> X-MS-Has-Attach: 
> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
> Thread-Topic: [sv-ac] friendly amendments to 1641
> Thread-Index: AcgWRy5bDoNzaUewSb+TTuOkoUpJXQAFT/Wg
> From: "Kulshrestha, Manisha" <Manisha_Kulshrestha@mentor.com>
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Oct 2007 16:40:33.0662 (UTC) FILETIME=[98CFD9E0:01C8165C]
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I have incorporated other friendly amendments so far except Shalom's
> comments. I'll take those into account in the next version.
> 
> Manisha
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On
> Behalf Of John Havlicek
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 7:07 AM
> To: sv-ac@server.eda.org
> Subject: [sv-ac] friendly amendments to 1641
> 
> Hi Folks:
> 
> I should have included Shalom's comments in the friendly=20
> amendments.  Those comments are in the notes for the=20
> item on Mantis.
> 
> Manisha:  Please ensure that these comments are addressed
> in revising 1641.
> 
> J.H.
> 
> --=20
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.