7.4.2 of Draft 4 says, "Each dimension shall be represented by an address range, such as [1:1024], or a single positive number to specify the size of an unpacked array, like C. In other words, [size] becomes the same as [0:size-1]." Regards, Shalom ________________________________ From: Bustan, Doron Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 5:02 PM To: Bresticker, Shalom; 'sv-ac@server.eda.org' Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 1995 review Ok I trust you on that, is integer my_ints[2] equivalent to integer my_ints[0:1] ? Thanks Doron ________________________________ From: Bresticker, Shalom Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 4:59 PM To: Bustan, Doron; sv-ac@server.eda.org Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 1995 review Doron, This is legal. Regards, Shalom page 2 first example: I think that "integer my_ints[2] = '{123, 456};" Should be "integer my_ints[0:1] = '{123, 456};" --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun Oct 21 08:05:16 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Oct 21 2007 - 08:05:28 PDT