Hi Doron, Omitting the "least index" requirement certainly seems to result in a more succinct definition though. From my point of view the purpose of formal definitions is not primarily to explain things in an intuitive way to users but to provide a tool for investigation of the logical connections among properties and so on (something that implementors need to do for example), and for this purpose definitions should be as succinct as possible, I think. Best Reagards, Johan On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:17:50AM +0200, Bustan, Doron wrote: > Hi Johan > > >>It seems to me that > >> > >>w^{0..i-1}T^\omega|=P for i the least index,0 < i < |w|, such that > w^i|=b, > >> > >>and > >> > >>w^{0..i-1}T^\omega|=P for some i,0 < i < |w|, such that w^i|=b > >> > >>are eqiuvalent. > >> > >>The reason for this is that if i<=j and > >> > >>w^{0..j}T^\omega|=P > >> > >>then > >> > >>w^{0..i}T^\omega|=P > >> > >>This means that we can simplify the semantic definition to > >> > >> w|= accept_on (b) P iff > >> > >> w|=P > >> or > >> w^{0..i-1}T^\omega|=P for some i,0 < i < |w|, such that w^i|=b > >> > >>or equivalently > >> > >> w|=P > >> or > >> there exists i such that 0 < i < |w| and w^i|=b and > w^{0..i->>1}T^\omega|=P > > > I agree about the equivalence but I am not sure whether it is simpler. I > think it is more intuitive to think of the first b. > > Doron > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Intel Israel (74) Limited > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Johan Mårtensson Office: +46 31 7451913 Jasper Design Automation Mobile: +46 703749681 Arvid Hedvalls backe 4 Fax: +46 31 7451939 411 33 Gothenburg, Sweden Skype ID: johanmartensson ------------------------------------------------------------ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Oct 17 02:48:43 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 17 2007 - 02:48:50 PDT