RE: [sv-ac] Draft4 review

Hi John,

In the proposal the font is italic and action_block is written as one
word. There are several occurrences of action_block and all of them are
italicized.

Thanks,
Dmitry

-----Original Message-----
From: John Havlicek [mailto:john.havlicek@freescale.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 3:24 AM
To: Korchemny, Dmitry
Cc: john.havlicek@freescale.com; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: Re: [sv-ac] Draft4 review

Hi Dmitry:

It is possible that the implemented font is correct.

If the reference is not to the name of the non-terminal
(including underscores), then I think that the LRM treats
it just as text, with no italicization.

Consider whether or not underscores should be added to match 
exactly the non-terminal.

J.H.

> X-ExtLoop1: 1
> X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,273,1188802800"; 
>    d="scan'208";a="298430546"
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:16:10 +0200
> X-MS-Has-Attach: 
> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
> Thread-Topic: [sv-ac] Draft4 review
> Thread-Index: AcgGgta2LJweySBARtafp56XchnAMwH4OHKA
> From: "Korchemny, Dmitry" <dmitry.korchemny@intel.com>
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Oct 2007 13:16:27.0494 (UTC)
FILETIME=[6D656860:01C80E64]
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I reviewed 1460 and fond the following issue:
> 
> In 16.14.2 It is written:
> 
> If it evaluates to false, the fail statements of the *** action block
> *** are executed.
> 
> Should be italicized action_block.
> 
> Thanks,
> Dmitry
> 
> P=2ES. I reopened this issue by mistake in Mantis, but reversed my
changes
> (except for the history :( )
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org]
On
> Behalf Of John Havlicek
> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 2:33 PM
> To: sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org
> Subject: [sv-ac] Draft4 review
> 
> Hi Folks:
> 
> We need to review the implementations in Draft4 of the following
Mantis
> items:
> 
> 1361 [TS/MK]
> 1460 [DK]
> 1550 [EC]
> 1674 [EC] (consider reference to 1648)
> 1677 [DK]
> 1704 [LP]
> 1730 [EC]
> 1734 [JH]
> 1735 [LP]
> 1768 [LP]
> 
> The owners of these items should review the implementation and send
> the results to the reflector.  Please consider any questions or issues
> in the notes from the Editor.
> 
> I would like for the reviews to be completed in one week (by
> 2007-10-11).  If the owner cannot do the review in this time, please
> try to find an alternate reviewer who can check the implementation in
> Draft4.
> 
> J=2EH.
> 
> 
> --=20
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.