RE: [sv-ac] 1758 passed - updated proposal

I see, that was not in the amendments, hence I did not know. I cannot do
that now, unfortuately. what changes did they do that could impact this
one?
ed 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 5:36 PM
> To: Eduard Cerny; john.havlicek@freescale.com; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 1758 passed - updated proposal
> 
> I did not look this over in detail, but it needs to be 
> coordinated with
> the proposal for Mantis 1035, which was approved by SV-BC.
> 
> Shalom 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org 
> > [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Eduard Cerny
> > Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 11:12 PM
> > To: john.havlicek@freescale.com; sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org
> > Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 1758 passed - updated proposal
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I have uploaded an updated proposal (also attached) that 
> > takes care of the amendments (I hope). In particular the 2nd one.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > ed 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On 
> Behalf Of 
> > > John Havlicek
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 10:35 AM
> > > To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> > > Subject: [sv-ac] 1758 passed
> > > 
> > > Hi Folks:
> > > 
> > > Our e-mail ballot on 1758 passed.  See the results below.
> > > 
> > > There were friendly amendments, and the proposal needs to 
> > be aligned 
> > > with Draft4.  Please send e-mail when these are completed.
> > > 
> > > J.H.
> > > 
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ----------------
> > > 
> > > Ballot on Mantis 1758
> > > 
> > > - Called on 2007-09-25, final ballots due by 2007-10-02 T 
> > 23:59-07:00.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > yv[xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xx] Doron Bustan (Intel)
> > > yv[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-x] Eduard Cerny 
> > (Synopsys)     
> > >  n[---------x-xxx---------x-x-xxx-x---x] Surrendra Dudani 
> > (Synopsys) 
> > > yv[xx-xxxxxxxxx-xx-xxxxx-xxx-xxx-------] Yaniv Fais (Freescale)  
> > > t[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] John Havlicek 
> (Freescale - 
> > > Chair) yv[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxrxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxx] Dmitry Korchemny 
> > > (Intel - Co-Chair) 
> yv[xx-xxx-x--xx--xxxxx----------xx-xxxx] Manisha 
> > > Kulshrestha (Mentor Graphics)  
> > n[-----------------xxxxx-------x-xx-x-] 
> > > Jiang Long (Mentor Graphics)  
> > n[---------x--xxx.....................] 
> > > Joseph Lu (Altera)  v[xxxxxx..............................] Johan 
> > > Martensson (Jasper)  
> n[--------------x--x-xx--xx-xxxxxxx-x-] Hillel 
> > > Miller (Freescale) yv[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx] 
> > Lisa Piper 
> > > (Cadence) yv[-xxxxxxx-x-xxxxx-x..................] Erik Seligman 
> > > (Intel)  n[-x--------xxxx-----xxxx-xx----------] Tej 
> Singh (Mentor 
> > > Graphics) yv[xx--xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Bassam Tabbara 
> > > (Synopsys) yv[xxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxx...............] Tom 
> > Thatcher (Sun
> > > Microsystems)
> > >    |------------------------------------ attendance on 2007-09-25
> > >  |-------------------------------------- voting eligibility 
> > for this 
> > > ballot
> > > |--------------------------------------- email ballots received
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 	Legend:
> > > 		x = attended
> > > 		- = missed
> > > 		r = represented
> > > 		. = not yet a member
> > > 		v = valid voter (2 out of last 3)
> > > 		n = not valid voter
> > >                 t = chair eligible to vote only to make or 
> > break a tie
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ----------------
> > > 
> > > Friendly amendments:
> > > 
> > > [MK]
> > > 
> > >    1. In syntax 11-7, it looks like '_' is used instead of '-' in 
> > > these
> > >    operators (or may be this is due to the conversion to 
> > pdf). Double 
> > > check
> > >    this and fix it if required.
> > >    
> > >    2. Instead of inserting text between Syntax 11-7 and 
> > table 11.1, it
> > >    would be better to have a subclause about these 
> operators under 
> > > 11.4
> > >    where different operators are described.
> > > 
> > > --
> > > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous 
> content by 
> > > MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous 
> > content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.